Question

which of these best describes the purpose for \hands - only\ cpr? a hands - only cpr is better and more effective than full cpr and is now the best way to provide cpr for any patient by any responder b hands - only cpr reduces risk of liability and increases oxygenation better than cpr with mouth - to - mouth resuscitation c hands - only cpr is now the only method for providing cpr regardless your level of education and expertise d hands - only cpr was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth - to - mouth breaths. it doesnt replace traditional cpr.

Explanation:

Hands - only CPR is an alternative for those not trained or uncomfortable with mouth - to - mouth. It's not a replacement for traditional CPR. Option A is incorrect as full CPR is still important in many cases. Option B is wrong because it doesn't increase oxygenation better and liability isn't the main purpose. Option C is false as traditional CPR is still a valid method.

Answer:

D. Hands - only CPR was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth - to - mouth breaths. It doesn't replace traditional CPR.