Question

which are the most likely reasons an interpretation of a historical event could change? check all that apply.
□ new evidence is discovered.
□ new opinions are considered.
□ pieces of evidence are lost or stolen.
□ oversights and errors are corrected.
□ new technology is applied to evidence.

Explanation:

• "New evidence is discovered": New evidence can provide new perspectives or facts, altering interpretations.
• "New opinions are considered": Different viewpoints can lead to re - evaluating historical events.
• "Oversights and errors are corrected": Fixing mistakes in previous analysis can change interpretations.
• "New technology is applied to evidence": New tech can reveal new info from existing evidence, changing how events are seen. "Pieces of evidence are lost or stolen" is less likely as losing evidence would limit understanding rather than change interpretation in a positive/constructive way.

Answer:

A. New evidence is discovered.
B. New opinions are considered.
D. Oversights and errors are corrected.
E. New technology is applied to evidence.