Question

which best explains the difference between renewable and nonrenewable resources?
a. nonrenewable resources can never run out.
b. nonrenewable resources are used up at a faster rate than they’re able to be replaced.
c. renewable resources aren’t as readily available as nonrenewable resources.
d. renewable resources can never run out.

Explanation:

To determine the correct option, we analyze the concepts of renewable and non - renewable resources. Renewable resources are those that can be replenished naturally over time (e.g., solar, wind, biomass), while non - renewable resources (like fossil fuels) are finite and take millions of years to form.

• Option A: Non - renewable resources are finite and will run out, so this is incorrect.
• Option B: Non - renewable resources are formed very slowly (geological timescales) and we use them at a much faster rate than they can be replaced. This accurately explains the difference between non - renewable (used faster than replaced) and renewable (replenished at a rate that can keep up with use or faster).
• Option C: The availability of a resource (renewable or non - renewable) depends on many factors like location, extraction technology, etc. It's not a defining difference between the two types. So this is incorrect.
• Option D: Renewable resources are generally sustainable and not at risk of “running out” in the same way non - renewable resources are. So this is incorrect.

Answer:

B. Nonrenewable resources are used up at a faster rate than they're able to be replaced.