Question

what was the significance of the supreme court case facebook, inc. v. duguid in relation to political texts?
this question is worth 10 point(s)
it required all political texts to include unsubscribe options
it ruled that auto - dialing without consent is illegal, but list - based dialing is allowed
it allowed unlimited political donations via text
it banned all political texts unless users opt in
submit response

Explanation:

In the Supreme Court case Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, the ruling was about the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The court held that auto - dialing (using an autodialer) without the recipient's consent is illegal. However, list - based dialing (where numbers are dialed from a pre - existing list, not using an autodialer in the TCPA - defined sense) is allowed. Option A is incorrect as the case was not about unsubscribe options for political texts. Option C is wrong as the case had nothing to do with political donations via text. Option D is incorrect as the case did not ban all political texts unless users opt in.

Answer:

B. It ruled that auto - dialing without consent is illegal, but list - based dialing is allowed