QUESTION IMAGE
Question
what did reagan and the republicans believe that government social programs had become?
a. they were supporting people remaining on welfare.
b. they were too costly and dragged the u.s. economy down as a whole.
c. they were ineffective and the government was not responsible for them.
d. they were causing too many people in government to get rich off of them.
Analyze the conservative critique of social programs
Using the Reagan Domestic Policy knowledge point, Ronald Reagan and the conservative movement of the 1980s argued that federal social welfare programs created a cycle of dependency. They believed these programs discouraged work and self-reliance, effectively supporting people in remaining on welfare rather than helping them transition into the workforce.
Evaluate the multiple-choice options
Using the Reaganomics knowledge point, we can assess the options:
- Option a directly aligns with the core conservative argument that social programs incentivized long-term dependency on government assistance.
- Option b focuses on the overall economic drag, which was a part of their fiscal critique, but the specific moral and social argument regarding "social programs" themselves was centered on welfare dependency.
- Option c mentions government responsibility, but Reagan argued the federal government should reduce its role, not that it had no responsibility at all.
- Option d suggests government corruption/enrichment, which was not the primary ideological argument against these programs.
Therefore, option a is the most accurate representation of their belief regarding what social programs had become.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
- a. They were supporting people remaining on welfare. (Correct answer)
- b. They were too costly and dragged the U.S. economy down as a whole.
- c. They were ineffective and the government was not responsible for them.
- d. They were causing too many people in government to get rich off of them.