Question

what does the quotation from claire christian in paragraph 8 best suggest about tourism in antarctica?
there is a need for strict governmental regulation of the tourism industry.
an overflow of tourists will have an adverse effect on the environment.
laws have not yet been established to regulate the tourism industry.
guidelines can ensure tourists will not interfere with scientific research.

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze each option by relating to the context of the quotation (even without the full text, we use logical reasoning about Antarctic tourism):

Analyzing Option A:

"Strict governmental regulation" might not be the focus if the quotation (likely about environmental impact or sustainable tourism) - but let's check others.

Analyzing Option B:

Antarctica has a fragile ecosystem. An overflow (high number) of tourists would harm the environment (e.g., pollution, disturbing wildlife). This aligns with typical concerns about Antarctic tourism - the quotation likely hints at negative environmental effects from too many tourists.

Analyzing Option C:

Laws for tourism in Antarctica (like the Antarctic Treaty System) do exist, so this is incorrect.

Analyzing Option D:

"Guidelines ensuring no interference with research" is too specific. The main concern with Antarctic tourism is usually environmental impact, not just research interference.

• Option A: The quotation likely focuses on environmental impact, not just regulation need. Eliminate.
• Option B: Antarctica’s fragile environment means excess tourists (overflow) would cause harm (adverse effect), matching typical tourism concerns here.
• Option C: Laws (e.g., Antarctic Treaty) regulate tourism, so this is false. Eliminate.
• Option D: The quotation is unlikely about research interference (narrow focus), and guidelines can’t “ensure” no interference. Eliminate.

Answer:

B. An overflow of tourists will have an adverse effect on the environment.