Question

the us finishes the job
america - now with the will of the people and a sizable fighting force - hit europe in a way unseen in history. watch this:

1. based on what you saw from this video, what was different about the american fighting style versus the european trench warfare style?
2. was this american fighting force effective? why?
3. why do you think america was so good so fast? remember, our military hasnt had any real \international\ experience yet. (no offense spain...)

Explanation:

1. American fighting style often emphasized more aggressive, mobile - based maneuvers compared to the static and defensive European trench warfare. Americans brought fresh energy and new tactics.
2. It was effective as it disrupted the stalemate of trench warfare, added new impetus to the Allied efforts, and their numbers and enthusiasm made a difference.
3. America had a large population, strong industrial base, and was able to quickly mobilize resources. Also, they learned from European experiences and had a motivated fighting force.

Answer:

1. American style was more mobile and aggressive compared to static European trench warfare.
2. Yes, it disrupted the stalemate and added impetus to Allied efforts.
3. Large population, strong industry, and ability to mobilize resources quickly.