Question

tina is writing an essay arguing that the fishing companies need to do more to prevent damage to coral reefs. which would be a good way to start tinas conclusion? coral reefs are not important to the earth. there are many small changes fishing companies need to make to prevent damage to coral reefs. most coral reefs are not important and do not need to be taken care of since theyre hardy. we should not help save the coral reefs for many reasons.

Explanation:

Since Tina is arguing that fishing companies need to do more to prevent damage to coral reefs, the conclusion should support her argument. The first option ("Coral Reefs are not important to the Earth") is incorrect as it goes against the idea of protecting them. The third option ("Most coral reefs are not important and do not need to be taken care of since they're hardy") is also wrong as it undermines the need for protection. The fourth option ("We should not help save the coral reefs for many reasons") is contrary to her argument. The second option ("There are many small changes fishing companies need to make to prevent damage to coral reefs") aligns with her thesis as it starts the conclusion by pointing out actions (small changes) fishing companies can take, which is in line with her argument that they need to do more.

Answer:

B. There are many small changes fishing companies need to make to prevent damage to coral reefs.