Question

the supreme court case worcester v. georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it

struck down laws created by the georgia legislature to seize cherokee lands.

ruled that the u.s. government’s indian removal act was unconstitutional.

declared that the u.s. government would honor the cherokee nation’s constitution.

iestablished the indian territory east of the mississippi in present - day oklahoma.

Explanation:

Worcester v. Georgia (1832) held that Georgia's laws extending over Cherokee lands were unconstitutional, as the Cherokee Nation was a sovereign entity. The ruling did not address the Indian Removal Act, nor did it establish Indian Territory or mandate honoring the Cherokee constitution specifically.

Answer:

A. struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.