Question

such as an aquifer, without depleting the source faster than the natural rate of replenishment. the goal of safe yield is to achieve a long - term balance between the amount of water withdrawn (pumped) and the amount of recharge (natural refill). by setting limits on how much water can be taken, safe yield helps protect groundwater sources for future generations.
text 2
safe yield is not as sustainable as many people claim it is. in theory, it focuses on balancing groundwater withdrawal from an aquifer with the aquifers natural recharge rates. however, it doesnt consider the natural outflow of water from the aquifer into bodies of water like springs and streams. even if humans pump at the safe yield rate, pumping can still lead to long - term water level decline and potentially negative impacts on spring and stream ecosystems.
based on the texts, how would the author of text 2 most likely respond to the claims about safe yield in text 1?
choose 1 answer:
a by arguing that safe yield may not be sustainable, as it doesnt account for the natural outflow of water from aquifers into rivers and streams
b by explaining that safe yield requires more advanced water - pumping technologies than are currently available, though it could become a viable strategy in the future
c by agreeing that safe yield is an effective water management method that preserves water for future generations
d by asserting that safe yield is a sustainable strategy for managing surface water systems like lakes and reservoirs, but not for managing groundwater systems like aquifers

Explanation:

Text 1 claims safe yield balances water withdrawal and recharge. Text 2 says safe yield isn't as sustainable as claimed, as it ignores natural outflow to springs/streams. So author of Text 2 would argue about lack of sustainability due to ignoring outflow.

Answer:

A. By arguing that safe yield may not be sustainable, as it doesn't account for the natural outflow of water from aquifers into rivers and streams