QUESTION IMAGE
Question
source c: a pardo petition (primary source, adapted from a 1796 petition)
context: this text is adapted from a petition by a pardo (mixed african and european) shoemakers’ guild in caracas, venezuela, to the spanish crown.
we, the pardo artisans, masters, and officers of the shoemakers’ guild, appear before your majesty... we have always served your majesty with loyalty, paid our taxes, and supported the community. we have proven our skill and honor through our work.
yet, the new city laws seek to ban us from the rank of \master\... this ban is based only on the \stain\ of our casta (our skin color), not on any lack of skill or loyalty.
this is a great injustice. how can it be that we are loyal subjects when it is time to pay taxes... but we are not worthy subjects when it is time to practice our trade?
| who is the author? | what rhetorical strategy are they using? how do you know (use evidence from the text)?(ethos, pathos, logos) | why are they using this rhetorical strategy? (in other words, what is their main goal?) |
|---|
Who is the author?
The author is the pardo artisans, masters, and officers of the shoemakers’ guild in Caracas, Venezuela. This is stated in the opening of the petition: "We, the pardo artisans, masters, and officers of the shoemakers’ guild...".
What Rhetorical Strategy are they using? How do you know (use evidence from the text)?(Ethos, Pathos, Logos)
They use Ethos and Logos.
- Ethos: They establish their credibility by highlighting their loyalty and contributions: "We have always served Your Majesty with loyalty, paid our taxes, and supported the community. We have proven our skill and honor through our work." This shows their good character and reliability as subjects.
- Logos: They use logical reasoning to point out the inconsistency in how they are treated: "How can it be that we are loyal subjects when it is time to pay taxes... but we are not worthy subjects when it is time to practice our trade?" This is a logical appeal to the fairness of the Spanish crown’s policies.
Why are they using this Rhetorical Strategy? (In other words, what is their main goal?)
Their main goal is to persuade the Spanish crown to reverse the new city laws that ban them from the rank of "master" in their guild. By using ethos (showing their loyalty and worthiness as subjects) and logos (pointing out the illogical nature of the ban), they aim to convince the crown that the ban is unjust and should be lifted, so they can practice their trade without discrimination based on their casta (skin color).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
Who is the author?
The pardo artisans, masters, and officers of the shoemakers’ guild in Caracas, Venezuela.
What Rhetorical Strategy are they using? How do you know (use evidence from the text)?(Ethos, Pathos, Logos)
- Rhetorical Strategy: Ethos and Logos.
- Evidence for Ethos: "We have always served Your Majesty with loyalty, paid our taxes, and supported the community. We have proven our skill and honor through our work."
- Evidence for Logos: "How can it be that we are loyal subjects when it is time to pay taxes... but we are not worthy subjects when it is time to practice our trade?"
Why are they using this Rhetorical Strategy? (In other words, what is their main goal?)
To persuade the Spanish crown to reverse the new city laws that ban them from the rank of "master" in their shoemakers’ guild, arguing that the ban is unjust and illogical.