Question

i have repeatedly asserted, and produced what appeared to me irrefragable arguments drawn from matters of fact, to prove my assertion, that women cannot, by force, be confined to domestic concerns; for they will, however ignorant, intermeddle with more weighty affairs, neglecting private duties only to disturb, by cunning tricks, the orderly plans of reason which rise above their comprehension. -a vindication of the rights of woman, mary wollstonecraft what central idea does wollstonecraft explicitly state in this passage? a lack of education will not make women care only about household issues. women are naturally interested only in domestic concerns. men do not take into account how cunning and tricky women can be. men and women are equally capable of logic and reason.

Explanation:

The passage states that women cannot be confined to domestic concerns. It implies that lack of education doesn't restrict women to household - only focus. Option B is contrary as the text says women are not naturally only interested in domestic. Option C about men not accounting for women's cunning is not the central idea. Option D about equal logic is not the main point. The key is that lack of education doesn't limit women to domestic.

Answer:

A. A lack of education will not make women care only about household issues.