Question

refer to the cartoon below.

cartoon image: two chefs, one holding a pirate flag (with skull and crossbones) pouring into a pot labeled \superpac advertising\, the other adding a drop from a bottle. speech bubble: \careful, now... too much and youll ruin the recipe...!\ source: cartoonstock.com

which of the following might result if the public came to hold similar opinions as the artist of this political cartoon?

• greater awareness by voters of the veracity of political advertising
• creation of a federal agency that examines campaign advertising before it is aired
• a change in law that allows greater coordination between super pacs and candidates
• a law that prevents groups from criticizing candidates with advertising

Explanation:

The cartoon depicts Super PAC advertising as a "recipe" with a skull - and - crossbones (implying something harmful), suggesting the artist views Super PAC advertising negatively. If the public shares this view, they'd be more aware of the truthfulness (veracity) of political ads.

• Option 2: Creating a federal agency to pre - examine ads is not likely as it's a heavy - handed approach and not a direct result of public awareness.
• Option 3: Allowing more coordination between Super PACs and candidates goes against the negative view of Super PACs shown in the cartoon.
• Option 4: Preventing groups from criticizing candidates with ads is unconstitutional (free speech issues) and not a likely outcome.

Answer:

A. Greater awareness by voters of the veracity of political advertising