Question

read the passage below: every teenager should work a job in high school, no matter what their situation is. my sister and i both worked in a local ice cream parlor, and we learned valuable skills such as time management, responsibility, and customer service. working a job can even help you get into college: the majority of college admissions offices take work experience into account when evaluating college applications. if every student brought that kind of real world experience to college, students would adjust more easily to the demands of college life as well as being more prepared to enter the workforce after college. the argument is flawed because it is based on an irrelevant side issue. it uses a faulty analogy to compare college and high school. it only uses anecdotes as evidence. it makes a hasty generalization.

Explanation:

The argument claims every teenager should work a high - school job based on the author's personal experience with their sister. This is a hasty generalization as it draws a broad conclusion for all teenagers from a single anecdotal example.

Answer:

it makes a hasty generalization.