Question

question 6 2 pts according to the documentary \the house we live in\, asian immigrants were ineligible to citizenship in the united states until the 1954 mccarran - walter act removed all racial barriers to naturalization. what rights were withheld from various racial groups who could not become citizens before 1954 in the us? right to habiuos corpus, right to juris prudence, right to e pluribus nom right to vote, own property, bring suit, testify in court right to free speech, right to marry whomever they want work and get paid at a job, get medical care question 7 2 pts according to the documentary \the house we live in\, \whiteness was key to citizenship. in 1790 congress had passed an act declaring that only \free white\ immigrants could become naturalized citizens. after the civil war, naturalization was extended to \persons of african descent\ as well. this information suggests that race is a biological fact social fact questionable fact economic fact

Explanation:

For Question 6:

• The right to vote, own property, bring suit, and testify in court are rights often associated with citizenship. Before 1954, non - citizen racial groups in the US were likely to be denied these rights. The right to habeas corpus is a fundamental legal right (though not always fully protected for non - citizens in discriminatory eras, but it's more of a legal process right rather than a citizenship - linked right in the context of the options). Jurisprudence is the theory and philosophy of law (not a right withheld in this context). "E pluribus unum" is a motto. Free speech is a First Amendment right (though there were discriminatory practices against non - whites, it's not as directly tied to citizenship as the voting, property - owning etc. rights in the context of the question). The right to marry (though there were anti - miscegenation laws, it's not the main set of rights withheld in the broad sense of citizenship - related rights). The right to work and get medical care (while there was discrimination, these are more basic human/societal rights rather than strictly citizenship - based rights in the context of the question).

For Question 7:

• The fact that Congress defined citizenship based on race (first "free white", then including "persons of African descent") shows that race is a social construct. Biological fact would imply a scientific, inherent classification (which race is not in a strict biological sense as there is more genetic variation within racial groups than between them). A questionable fact is too vague. An economic fact would relate to economic systems (not relevant here). A social fact means that race is defined by social, legal, and cultural norms (as shown by the congressional acts defining citizenship based on race).

Answer:

Question 6: right to vote, own property, bring suit, testify in court
Question 7: social fact