Question

question 15 (1 point)
what is the primary concern of meta - ethical relativism?
describing the diversity of moral practices across cultures.
arguing that moral judgments are mere expressions of emotion.
holding that moral judgments are not true or false in an absolute sense, but only relative to particular standpoints.
prescribing tolerance for all moral beliefs and practices.
question 16 (1 point)
what is a key objection concerning moral relativism and a societys capacity for self - criticism?
it promotes an objective standard for societal self - improvement.
it encourages continuous moral revolution within a culture.
it makes societies overly critical of their own traditions.
it is difficult to see how prevailing norms can be criticized on moral grounds if their rightness is relative to those very norms.

Explanation:

Meta - ethical relativism focuses on the nature of moral judgments. It posits that moral judgments lack an absolute truth - value. Instead, their validity is relative to specific viewpoints. For example, what is considered moral in one cultural or historical context may not hold the same moral standing in another.

Regarding the objection to moral relativism and societal self - criticism: If moral norms are only valid relative to themselves (as per moral relativism), then there is no external, objective moral standard to use for criticizing those norms. A society would struggle to engage in meaningful self - criticism because any critique would be based on the very norms being evaluated.

Answer:

Question 15: Holding that moral judgments are not true or false in an absolute sense, but only relative to particular standpoints.
Question 16: It is difficult to see how prevailing norms can be criticized on moral grounds if their rightness is relative to those very norms.