Question

opinion
the supreme court ruled that a federal agency, in this case, the national bank, could not be taxed by a state government. this was an issue about federalism – states’ rights vs. federal supremacy.

1. why is this case historically significant? (importance/result)

national bank could not be taxed by a state government.

Explanation:

This case is historically significant because it established a key principle in federalism. By ruling that the National Bank (a federal agency) could not be taxed by a state government, it reinforced the concept of federal supremacy over state rights in such matters. This decision helped clarify the balance of power between the federal government and state governments in the United States.

Answer:

This case is historically significant as it reinforced federal supremacy over state rights regarding the taxation of federal agencies, clarifying the power - balance in U.S. federalism.