modern world history south africa’s ed cite common assessment
prompt:
compare hendrik f. verwoerd’s stated beliefs about “separate development” in source 1 with the actual conditions and outcomes of the bantustan system in source 2.
rewrite the prompt in your own words
make a claim that discusses whether you think bantustan were a success?
use evidence, facts, and details from both sources to support your argument.

source 1:
martin roberts, a historian writing in a school textbook, south africa, 1948 to 1998, 2001.
.... prime minister of south africa, hendrik f. verwoerd, believed that he had a god - given mission to secure the future of christianity with south africa. he realized that in a changing world where many black african colonies were winning independence and where international opinion would no longer tolerate old - style white supremacy, the image of apartheid needed to be changed.
his solution was to offer the blacks the apparent chance to develop as they wanted, separately from the whites in their homelands, which, if their inhabitants wished, could become completely independent nations. these he called bantu national units. although his critics preferred the term bantustans, and he argued that the policy of separate development is designed for the happiness, security and stability provided by their home language and administration for the bantu as well as the whites”.... the policy was a total success with the white population who rewarded hendrik f. verwoerd and his national party with their votes.

source 2
extract from “this is apartheid”, a publication from the international defense and aid fund for southern africa, published in 1984.
.... the apartheid regime has tried to enforce strict territorial segregation. the greater part of the country has been declared “white.” people are forcibly evicted from their homes where these fall with a zone assigned to another group. most of those moved have been africans forced into the 13% of la allocated to them. this area consists of numerous fragments grouped into ten units called ‘bantusta most of which are made up of several bits of land. every african is assigned to a bantustan, chiefl based on language. the forced removals, and resettlement policy has led to a huge increase in the number of people in the bantustans.
the bantustans contain few major mineral deposits compared with the rest of the country an commercial and industrial centers. they cannot support the populations assigned to them, there jobs inside the bantustans for their residents, who are needed to work in the rest of the country industry and down the mines. the aim has been to allow the homelands to develop greater sel government. however, the bantustan authorities, lacking legitimacy and popular support are power by the central government and the voting right of africans are limited to the bantusta structures

Question

modern world history south africa’s ed cite common assessment
prompt:
compare hendrik f. verwoerd’s stated beliefs about “separate development” in source 1 with the actual conditions and outcomes of the bantustan system in source 2.
rewrite the prompt in your own words
make a claim that discusses whether you think bantustan were a success?
use evidence, facts, and details from both sources to support your argument.

source 1:
martin roberts, a historian writing in a school textbook, south africa, 1948 to 1998, 2001.
.... prime minister of south africa, hendrik f. verwoerd, believed that he had a god - given mission to secure the future of christianity with south africa. he realized that in a changing world where many black african colonies were winning independence and where international opinion would no longer tolerate old - style white supremacy, the image of apartheid needed to be changed.
his solution was to offer the blacks the apparent chance to develop as they wanted, separately from the whites in their homelands, which, if their inhabitants wished, could become completely independent nations. these he called bantu national units. although his critics preferred the term bantustans, and he argued that the policy of separate development is designed for the happiness, security and stability provided by their home language and administration for the bantu as well as the whites”.... the policy was a total success with the white population who rewarded hendrik f. verwoerd and his national party with their votes.

source 2
extract from “this is apartheid”, a publication from the international defense and aid fund for southern africa, published in 1984.
.... the apartheid regime has tried to enforce strict territorial segregation. the greater part of the country has been declared “white.” people are forcibly evicted from their homes where these fall with a zone assigned to another group. most of those moved have been africans forced into the 13% of la allocated to them. this area consists of numerous fragments grouped into ten units called ‘bantusta most of which are made up of several bits of land. every african is assigned to a bantustan, chiefl based on language. the forced removals, and resettlement policy has led to a huge increase in the number of people in the bantustans.
the bantustans contain few major mineral deposits compared with the rest of the country an commercial and industrial centers. they cannot support the populations assigned to them, there jobs inside the bantustans for their residents, who are needed to work in the rest of the country industry and down the mines. the aim has been to allow the homelands to develop greater sel government. however, the bantustan authorities, lacking legitimacy and popular support are power by the central government and the voting right of africans are limited to the bantusta structures

Accepted Answer

# Brief Explanations:
The problem involves analyzing historical sources about South Africa's Bantustan system and Verwoerd's beliefs, which falls under the Social Science subfield of History. To rewrite the prompt: First, understand the original prompt's request to compare Verwoerd's stated beliefs on "separate development" (from Source 1) with the actual conditions/outcomes of Bantustans (from Source 2), then make a claim on Bantustans' success using evidence. So rephrase it to clearly state the comparison and the claim - making task. For example: "Compare Hendrik F. Verwoerd’s beliefs about 'separate development' (from Source 1) with the actual conditions and results of the Bantustan system (from Source 2). Then, take a position on whether the Bantustans were successful, using evidence, facts, and details from both sources to support your argument."
# Answer:
Rewrite the prompt as: "Compare Hendrik F. Verwoerd’s beliefs about 'separate development' as presented in Source 1 with the actual conditions and outcomes of the Bantustan system described in Source 2. Then, formulate a claim about whether the Bantustans were a success, and support this claim with evidence, facts, and details from both sources."

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Answer: