human rights versus property rights. that argument goes on today as, for example, we debate how closely to regulate coal mining. is it best to let owners set rules, which is likely to give all of us cheaper coal, or to have the government set standards, which is more likely to protect workers and the environment? in france, one side argued that slaves must be freed. the other said that to change anything in the sugar islands would invite slave revolts, help frances rivals, and thus hurt the nation. in the new united states, the revolution gave white men with property a sense of freedom, while africans were still enslaved. in england, abolitionists spoke up for africans, but kings and lords still ruled. in france, revolutionaries were turning against their own nobles but remained uncertain about what this meant for enslaved africans on their sugar islands. the age of revolutions was pressing ideas of freedom against the rights of property, and no one was sure where these great clashes would lead. which line from the passage best provides evidence that the sugar trade led to the end of slavery? o \in france, one side argued that slaves must be freed.\ o o change anything in the sugar islands would invite slave revolts, help frances rivals, and thus hurt the nation.\ o
o one was sure where these great clashes would lead.\ o \in revolutionary france, the defenders of slaves began to win the argument against the advocates of property rights.\

Question

human rights versus property rights. that argument goes on today as, for example, we debate how closely to regulate coal mining. is it best to let owners set rules, which is likely to give all of us cheaper coal, or to have the government set standards, which is more likely to protect workers and the environment? in france, one side argued that slaves must be freed. the other said that to change anything in the sugar islands would invite slave revolts, help frances rivals, and thus hurt the nation. in the new united states, the revolution gave white men with property a sense of freedom, while africans were still enslaved. in england, abolitionists spoke up for africans, but kings and lords still ruled. in france, revolutionaries were turning against their own nobles but remained uncertain about what this meant for enslaved africans on their sugar islands. the age of revolutions was pressing ideas of freedom against the rights of property, and no one was sure where these great clashes would lead. which line from the passage best provides evidence that the sugar trade led to the end of slavery? o \in france, one side argued that slaves must be freed.\ o 	o change anything in the sugar islands would invite slave revolts, help frances rivals, and thus hurt the nation.\ o
o one was sure where these great clashes would lead.\ o \in revolutionary france, the defenders of slaves began to win the argument against the advocates of property rights.\

Accepted Answer

# Brief Explanations:
The line “In revolutionary France, the defenders of slaves began to win the argument against the advocates of property rights” shows that the pro - freedom (anti - slavery) side was succeeding. This implies that the sugar trade - related debates (as the sugar islands had slaves) were leading to the end of slavery as the human rights (freedom for slaves) argument was winning over the property rights (keeping slaves as property) argument.
# Answer:
“In revolutionary France, the defenders of slaves began to win the argument against the advocates of property rights.”

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Answer: