Question

how is the information about the government rules in “keeping a language alive” different from “language warriors”? add the difference to the chart. \language warriors\: in the past, the united states government created many policies that were damaging to native cultures. \keeping a language alive\: my mother and grandmother didnt speak the language. back then, the government forced native children to go to boarding schools. \keeping a language alive\ explains when vukelich learned about the government rules. \keeping a language alive\ shows how vukelichs family was harmed by the government rules. \keeping a language alive\ tells why vukelich was forced to follow the government rules.

Explanation:

"Language Warriors" gives a general statement about US government policies harming Native cultures. "Keeping a Language Alive" is more personal, sharing family - related impact of government - forced actions on Native children. The difference is that "Keeping a Language Alive" provides a personal family - centered account of the impact of government rules, while "Language Warriors" gives a more general statement about government policies.

Answer:

"Keeping a Language Alive" provides a personal family - centered account of the impact of government rules, while "Language Warriors" gives a more general statement about government policies.