Question

how are icbms different from the first atomic weapons used at hiroshima and nagasaki? check all that apply. icbms are more than a million times more powerful than the bombs used in the war. unlike the bombs used during world war ii, icbms are considered nuclear weapons. icbms can be launched more than a thousand miles away from their target. unlike the bombs used during world war ii, only a limited number of icbms were constructed. icbms are missiles, and the first atomic weapons were conventional bombs.

Explanation:

ICBMs (Inter - Continental Ballistic Missiles) are long - range missiles, capable of being launched from great distances to reach their targets. The first atomic weapons used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not missiles and didn't have such long - range launch capabilities. The other statements are incorrect as the first atomic weapons were also nuclear, ICBMs are not a million times more powerful in a general sense, and there is no basis for the claim about the limited number of construction compared to WWII bombs in this context, and the first atomic weapons were not conventional.

Answer:

C. ICBMs can be launched more than a thousand miles away from their target