QUESTION IMAGE
Question
... the election of members of parliament *
ought to be free;
a king or queen cant make or enforce without the consent of parliament
a king or queen cant interfere with parliamentary elections
if a law is broken, the government cant issue overly harsh punishments, fines, or
bail.
protestants have the right to own weapons.
speech can be limited in parliament, and members cannot be punished for what they
say in parliament.
The statement emphasizes the freedom of Parliamentary elections. The option "A king or queen can't interfere with Parliamentary elections" directly relates to this as interference would violate the principle of free elections. The other options address different aspects like law - making consent (A), punishment (C), weapon - ownership (D), and Parliamentary speech (E) which are not about election freedom.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
B. A king or queen can't interfere with Parliamentary elections