QUESTION IMAGE
Question
the domain of u (x) is the set of all real values except 0 and the domain of v (x) is the set of all real values except 2. what are the restrictions on the domain of (u o v) (x)? u (x) ≠ 2 and v (x) ≠ 0; x ≠ 2 and x cannot be any value for which v (x) = 0; x ≠ 0 and x cannot be any value for which u (x) = 2; u (x) ≠ 0 and v(x) ≠ 2
- Recall the definition of the composition of functions \((u\circ v)(x)=u(v(x))\).
- First, for the function \(v(x)\), its domain is all real numbers except \(2\). So, in the composition \(u(v(x))\), the input to \(u\) is \(v(x)\), but we first need to ensure that \(v(x)\) is defined. So, \(x\) must be such that \(v(x)\) is defined, which means \(x
eq2\) (since the domain of \(v(x)\) excludes \(2\)).
- Second, for the function \(u(y)\) (where \(y = v(x)\)), the domain of \(u(y)\) is all real numbers except \(0\). So, we need \(y=v(x)
eq0\) because if \(v(x) = 0\), then \(u(v(x))=u(0)\) is undefined (since the domain of \(u\) excludes \(0\)). In other words, we need \(u(v(x))\) to be defined, so \(v(x)
eq0\) (because \(u\) is undefined at \(0\)) and \(x
eq2\) (because \(v\) is undefined at \(2\)). This can be rephrased as \(u(x)
eq0\) (wait, no, correction: \(u(v(x))\) is undefined when \(v(x) = 0\) (because \(u\) is undefined at \(0\)) and \(v(x)\) is undefined when \(x = 2\). So the restrictions are \(v(x)
eq2\) (i.e., \(x
eq2\)) and \(u(v(x))\) is defined only when \(v(x)
eq0\) (because \(u\) is undefined at \(0\)), which is equivalent to saying that we need \(u(x)\) (wait, no, \(u(v(x))\) requires \(v(x)\) to be in the domain of \(u\). The domain of \(u\) is all real numbers except \(0\), so \(v(x)
eq0\), and the domain of \(v\) is all real numbers except \(2\), so \(x
eq2\). So the correct restrictions are \(u(v(x))\) is defined when \(v(x)\) is in the domain of \(u\) (so \(v(x)
eq0\)) and \(x\) is in the domain of \(v\) (so \(x
eq2\)). But looking at the options, the option \(u(x)
eq0\) and \(v(x)
eq2\) is incorrect in notation but the closest in meaning. Wait, actually, the correct reasoning is:
- For \((u\circ v)(x)=u(v(x))\), the domain of \(v\) is \(\{x\in\mathbb{R}|x
eq2\}\) (so \(v(x)\) is defined when \(x
eq2\)). Then, the input to \(u\) is \(v(x)\), and the domain of \(u\) is \(\{y\in\mathbb{R}|y
eq0\}\). So we need \(v(x)
eq0\) (so that \(u(v(x))\) is defined). But the option that says \(u(x)
eq0\) and \(v(x)
eq2\) is mis - written in terms of the variable, but it's the only option that captures the two key points: \(v(x)\) must be defined (so \(x
eq2\) or \(v(x)
eq2\) (since \(v\) is undefined at \(2\))) and \(u(v(x))\) must be defined (so \(v(x)
eq0\), which is equivalent to saying that we can't have \(u\) acting on \(0\), so in terms of the composition, the restrictions are that \(v(x)\) is defined (\(x
eq2\)) and \(v(x)\) is in the domain of \(u\) (\(v(x)
eq0\)). The option \(u(x)
eq0\) and \(v(x)
eq2\) is the only one that has the two correct types of restrictions: one on \(v(x)\) ( \(v(x)
eq2\) means \(x
eq2\)) and one on \(u\) ( \(u(x)
eq0\) is a mis - notation, but it's the only option that tries to say that \(u\) can't have an input of \(0\) (i.e., \(v(x)
eq0\)) and \(v\) can't have an input of \(2\) (i.e., \(x
eq2\))).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
The bottom - left option: \(u(x)
eq0\) and \(v(x)
eq2\)