Question

1 dedicated teams of video game players from all over the world compete in professional gaming tournaments, and the industry has a huge following. thousands of excited fans gather in stadiums all over the world to watch their gaming heroes battle for the championship in popular video games. massively multiplayer online games (mmos) are the driving force behind the movement. lately, however, a debate has begun about whether gaming can be called a
eal\ sport. a \sport\ is most commonly thought of as a rule - bound competition that requires a high level of skill. at this basic level, then, gaming should be considered a sport because it fits the definition. moreover, gaming competitions have a large spectator following, and they require
what is the authors main claim or argument?
competitive video gaming has its own definition of why its called a sport.
competitive video gaming has a massive following of fans.
competitive video gaming should be viewed as a professional sport.
competitive video gaming requires as much training as traditional sports.

Explanation:

The text starts by presenting the popularity of competitive video gaming. Then it brings up the debate about whether gaming is a "real" sport. It states that at a basic level (rule - bound competition requiring skill), gaming fits the definition of a sport. Also, it mentions the large spectator following. These points support the idea that competitive video gaming should be seen as a sport. The first option about having its own definition is too vague. The second option about the fan following is just a supporting detail. The fourth option about training is not mentioned in the text.

Answer:

Competitive video gaming should be viewed as a professional sport.