Question

consider this claim: professional video gaming should be considered a sport because it shares many characteristics with other sports. which is the strongest evidence to support the claim? sociology professor alice lawson notes, \the definition of a sport has always been up for debate. is chess a sport? is dance a sport? this is something people have always disagreed about.\ competitive video gaming often occurs in an atmosphere similar to that of other major sports: a large arena with cheering fans and millions of dollars on the table. according to tommy carter, a sports journalist, \professional gaming doesnt require physical ability or contact. sports are, and always have been, physical.\

Explanation:

The claim is that professional video gaming should be considered a sport because it shares many characteristics with other sports. The second option provides evidence about the competitive atmosphere (large arena, cheering fans, money at stake) which is a characteristic shared with other major sports. The first option is more about the debate around what constitutes a sport in general (mentions chess and dance) rather than specifically supporting video - gaming as a sport. The third option is a counter - argument against considering professional gaming as a sport.

Answer:

Competitive video gaming often occurs in an atmosphere similar to that of other major sports: a large arena with cheering fans and millions of dollars on the table.