Question

in the case gitlow v. new york, gitlow argued
that his first amendment rights were being violated.
that he couldnt be convicted of the same crime twice.
that his sixth amendment rights guaranteed him the right to a jury.
that he couldnt be jailed without being charged with a crime.

Explanation:

In Gitlow v. New York, Gitlow was convicted for distributing socialist literature. He argued his First Amendment (freedom of speech, press) rights were violated. The other options: double jeopardy (5th Amend) is for same - crime - twice, 6th Amend jury right is about trial by jury, and no - jail - without - charge is due - process (5th/14th Amend) related, not what Gitlow argued.

Answer:

A. that his First Amendment rights were being violated.