Question

anaya explains how to apply for a fellowship to support his point of view.
anaya compares his writing to a friend’s writing to support his point of view.
anaya lists a series of facts about language to support his point of view.
left text (partially visible): an rushdie, one of the ut the importance of ere books were as ropped a piece of bread i also kissed the object ooks before he had usehold, and for many mage of the kissing of the impression on me. it have for them.
i we had very few books eading was my catechism

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze each option:

1. The first option about applying for a fellowship is not a typical way Anaya (likely in a literary context) would support a point—fellowship applications are unrelated to literary argumentation here.
2. The second option: Comparing his writing to a friend’s writing is a valid rhetorical strategy (comparison/contrast) to support a point about writing, which aligns with literary analysis (Arts - Literature/Linguistics context).
3. The third option about listing facts about language is less likely, as the left - side text (mentioning books, kissing objects, household, etc.) does not suggest a focus on language facts.

The correct option is the one where Anaya uses comparison (his writing vs. a friend’s writing) to support his point. The other options (fellowship application, listing language facts) do not match the context of the left - side text (about books, personal experiences with them) or typical literary argumentation strategies.

Answer:

Anaya compares his writing to a friend’s writing to support his point of view.