Question

analyzing accounts of the same topic — instruction — level d
how is the information about the government rules in \keeping a language alive\ different from \language warriors\? add the difference to the chart.
\language warriors\
in the past, the united states government created many policies that were damaging to native cultures.
\keeping a language alive\
my mother and grandmother didnt speak the language. back then, the government forced native children to go to boarding schools.
difference
?
\keeping a language alive\ explains when vukelich learned about the government rules.
\keeping a language alive\ shows how vukelichs family was harmed by the government rules.
\keeping a language alive\ tells why vukelich was forced to follow the government rules.

Explanation:

"Language Warriors" gives a general statement about U.S. government policies damaging to Native cultures. "Keeping a Language Alive" gives a personal - family related example of government - forced action (sending Native children to boarding schools) that affected the family's language use.

Answer:

"Keeping a Language Alive" provides a personal family - related example of the impact of government rules, while "Language Warriors" gives a more general statement about government policies harming Native cultures.