Question

which statement would edward abbey most likely agree with, based on your reading of the damnation of a canyon? a. nature is extremely dangerous and needs to be conquered before people can truly enjoy it. b. people who think they can improve on what nature has already provided are reckless. c. hydroelectricity is worth the price of interfering with the natural balance of the wilderness. d. bringing as many people as possible to nature should be the goal of any recreational area.

Explanation:

In "The Damnation of a Canyon", Edward Abbey is critical of human interference with nature (like damming canyons for hydroelectricity). Option B aligns with his view that those who try to "improve" nature (by altering it) are reckless, as he values natural wilderness and opposes such meddling. Option A suggests conquering nature, which he would disagree with. Option C supports hydroelectricity (interfering with nature), which he opposes. Option D promotes overcrowding nature, which goes against his preservationist views.

Answer:

B. People who think they can improve on what nature has already provided are reckless.