Question

4 multiple answer 2 points tire prints with unique manufacturing defects that link then positively to a church van direct circumstantial biological physical

Explanation:

• Direct evidence would directly prove a fact (e.g., seeing the van at the crime scene), but tire prints with defects linking to a van are not direct proof of an action, so not Direct.
• Circumstantial evidence implies evidence that requires inference (the tire print defect links the van to a scene, inferring the van was there), so Circumstantial applies.
• Biological evidence involves biological materials (DNA, blood), tire prints are not biological, so not Biological.
• Physical evidence is tangible evidence from the scene (tire prints are physical objects/imprints), so Physical applies.

Answer:

B. Circumstantial, D. Physical